WEKO3
アイテム
中国辺境諸民族の文化と居住地 : エーバーハルト説の紹介と評価 : そのI. 概観
https://doi.org/10.15021/00004187
https://doi.org/10.15021/00004187e25cf80a-0994-4508-a419-d94a5aa99c80
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KH_020_2_002.pdf (2.7 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2010-02-16 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | 中国辺境諸民族の文化と居住地 : エーバーハルト説の紹介と評価 : そのI. 概観 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | Ethnic Groups iBorder Regions of China in Historical Times : An Appraisal of “Kultur und Siedlung der Randvölker Chinas” by Wolfram Eberhard. Part I : General Considerations | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | 中国｜辺境｜民族｜歴史｜エーバーハルト | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | China｜border regions｜ethnic groups｜history｜Eberhard | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15021/00004187 | |||||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
大林, 太良
× 大林, 太良
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | Wolfram Eberhard (1909-1989), the German born sinologist and ethnologist, published his two major contributions to the ethnology and cultural history of China in 1942: Kultur und Siedlung der Randvolker Chinas (Culture and Settlement of Peoples in the Border Regions of China) and Lokalkulturen im alten China (Local Cultures in Ancient China) . These two works are companion volumes; Kultur und Siedlung classifies and describes non-Han Chinese peoples on the outskirts of China Proper in historical times, while Lokalkulturen formulates local cultures which are supposed to have contributed to the formation of Chinese civilization, using data from the cultural history and folklore of the Han-Chinese. Both aim at the reconstruction of ethnic components of Chinese civilization and contain stimulating insights and suggestions. Kultur und Siedlung classifies about 800 non-Chinese peoples into 5 major categories: (1) Peoples in northern border regions, (2) peoples in western border regions, (3) peoples in southern border regions, (4) legendary peoples, and (5) peoples recorded only for ages before the Han dynasty. Categories 1 to 3 are subdivided further into some local groups of peoples respectively. Each local group represents a culture complex and belongs to a linguistic family. In the present paper I have tried to evaluate Eberhard's results from three view points: ecological background, linguistic affiliation and prehistoric foundation. Eberhard's groupings fit quite well with the physiographic areas proposed by G.B. Cressey. This implies that each group probably developed in a specific ecological area, although Eberhard paid only scanty attention to the ecological conditions of his groups. The study of dialects of the Chinese language by M. Hashimoto indicates that most of the southern dialects developed on non-Chinese substrata. This lends support to the cardinal idea of Eberhard that Chinese civilization contains a series of non-Han components. Yet in some points his theory is weakly founded; he supposed, for example, that both the Yao and the ancient Yiieh were Austronesian speakers, and the Liao Austroasiatic speakers. These are very dubious attributions in the light of recent studies by P. Benedict and E.G. Pulleyblank. Contemporary archaeological investigations by Chinese scholars, among others Su Bing Qi, have revealed the existence of some local cultures in the neolithic age which eventually contributed to the formation of Chinese civilization. Eberhard's pioneer attempt to classify non-Han peoples and to establish local ethnic cultures anticipated in a sense the recent movement by Chinese archaeologists. Eberhard was right in the main in his classification of peoples and cultures. Yet his theory has a shortcoming in that he failed to recognize the cultural and linguistic local unit which made up the core of the Chinese and their civilization, located in the Middle Yellow River area. |
|||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
国立民族学博物館研究報告 en : Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology 巻 20, 号 2, p. 313-356, 発行日 1995-11-10 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 国立民族学博物館 | |||||||||||
| 出版者（英） | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | National Museum of Ethnology | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0385-180X | |||||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00091943 | |||||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||||
