ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To

Field does not validate

To

Field does not validate

To
lat lon distance


インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

  • RootNode

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 国立民族学博物館研究報告
  2. 10巻3号

嘉戎語の能格性

https://doi.org/10.15021/00004393
https://doi.org/10.15021/00004393
e00d44b8-f1ff-4a13-b39d-ab8327cb0592
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
KH_010_3_002.pdf KH_010_3_002.pdf (1.3 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2010-02-16
タイトル
タイトル 嘉戎語の能格性
タイトル
タイトル Ergativity of the rGyarong Language
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.15021/00004393
ID登録タイプ JaLC
著者 長野, 泰彦

× 長野, 泰彦

en Nagano, Yasuhiko

ja 長野, 泰彦

ja-Kana ナガノ, ヤスヒコ

ISNI

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 rGyarong is a Tibeto-Burman language, spoken in northwestern
Sichuan Province, China. The language has long
attracted scholarly attention, because of the striking similarity
of some lexical items to Tibetan orthography, and owing to its
entangled morphological as well as morpho-syntactic processes.
In no previous study, however, has there been any clear-cut
description of the language's complexity. The verb morphology
and verb-related morpho-syntax, above all, show such a puzzling
structure that no earlier works on rGyarong seem to have provided
any convincing analyses.
I have already presented three papers on affixal matters;
in this paper, ergativity is discussed. To my understanding,
ergative is one of the transitivity structures in which the transitive
agent requires a (case) marker, while accusative structure is one
where the transitive patient is marked. The unmarked member
is regarded as being in the absolutive case, which is inserted at the
object position in ergative structure, and at the subject position
in accusative.
As Bauman [1975] pointed out, Tibeto-Burman has a variety
of morphological types of ergativity and their ways of appearance
vary from language to language. A very limited number of the
Tibeto-Burman languages are consistently ergative and many
others belong to the split-ergative type. This will be further
subclassified according to the degree of optionality and mixture
of case markers.
rGyarong is classified as being of the split-ergative type, but
because of the poverty of syntactic or textual data, Bauman's
argument on rGyarong is somewhat brief. This paper focusses
on how split and mixed it is in terms of ergativity, from the
historical perspective of Tibeto-Burman in general.
書誌情報 国立民族学博物館研究報告
en : Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology

巻 10, 号 3, p. 575-601, 発行日 1986-02-22
出版者
出版者 国立民族学博物館
出版者(英)
出版者 National Museum of Ethnology
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0385-180X
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00091943
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-06-20 17:59:21.950014
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3