ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To

Field does not validate

To

Field does not validate

To
lat lon distance


インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

  • RootNode

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 国立民族学博物館研究報告
  2. 31巻1号

中国人類学の独自性と可能性

https://doi.org/10.15021/00003974
https://doi.org/10.15021/00003974
0c0ef649-9fc2-47e3-93d5-833429487bce
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
KH_031_1_006.pdf KH_031_1_006.pdf (886.1 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2010-02-16
タイトル
タイトル 中国人類学の独自性と可能性
タイトル
タイトル The Originality and Potential of Chinese Anthropology
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 中国人類学|ソ連式|中国化|独自性|可能性
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 Chinese anthropology|Soviet model|sinicization|originality|potential
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.15021/00003974
ID登録タイプ JaLC
著者 秦, 兆雄

× 秦, 兆雄

秦, 兆雄

en Qin, Zhaoxiong

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Like sociology, ethnology, and folklore studies, anthropology in mainland
China was nothing but an importation from western countries and westernized
Japanese scholars during the final years of the Qing dynasty and the first
years of the Republic of China. In the middle of the formation of the Republic
of China and even while facing Japanese invasions, many anthropologists
like Fei Xiaotong and Lin Yaohua were very active in their academic efforts.
Much fieldwork was done and their ethnographies were published in English
and Chinese.
Yet, after the establishment of the People’s Republic of China, the Soviet
academic leadership suppressed and negated sociological and anthropological
studies in China. Only the ethnology of minorities in remote areas was
encouraged. As the result of Chinese-Soviet confrontation, ethnological studies
of China were utterly negated by Mao Zedong. The stage of anthropological
fieldwork had moved from mainland China to Taiwan and Hong Kong.
But, due to the Chinese government’s policy changes in 1978, all of those
studies have been revived. Now academic exchanges with associations in
western countries are very active. However, anthropology in China as an academic
discipline has not yet been established and systematized as a fullfledged
science. Now is the time for Chinese anthropologists to realize ‘real
Chinese anthropology.’
Though a number of academic papers have been written and introduced
in European countries about Chinese anthropological works, some of them,
unfortunately, lack an impartial outlook. I would like to look back at the outlook
of those Chinese scholars in the past, and to review the problems of
anthropology in China.
書誌情報 国立民族学博物館研究報告
en : Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology

巻 31, 号 1, p. 117-153, 発行日 2007-02-02
出版者
出版者 国立民族学博物館
出版者(英)
出版者 National Museum of Ethnology
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0385-180X
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00091943
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-06-20 17:22:04.585948
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

Qin, Zhaoxiong, 2007, The Originality and Potential of Chinese Anthropology: 国立民族学博物館, 117–153 p.

Loading...

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3