@article{oai:minpaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00003982,
 author = {秦, 兆雄 and Qin, Zhaoxiong},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {国立民族学博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology},
 month = {Feb},
 note = {Like sociology, ethnology, and folklore studies, anthropology in mainland
China was nothing but an importation from western countries and westernized
Japanese scholars during the final years of the Qing dynasty and the first
years of the Republic of China. In the middle of the formation of the Republic
of China and even while facing Japanese invasions, many anthropologists
like Fei Xiaotong and Lin Yaohua were very active in their academic efforts.
Much fieldwork was done and their ethnographies were published in English
and Chinese.
Yet, after the establishment of the People’s Republic of China, the Soviet
academic leadership suppressed and negated sociological and anthropological
studies in China. Only the ethnology of minorities in remote areas was
encouraged. As the result of Chinese-Soviet confrontation, ethnological studies
of China were utterly negated by Mao Zedong. The stage of anthropological
fieldwork had moved from mainland China to Taiwan and Hong Kong.
But, due to the Chinese government’s policy changes in 1978, all of those
studies have been revived. Now academic exchanges with associations in
western countries are very active. However, anthropology in China as an academic
discipline has not yet been established and systematized as a fullfledged
science. Now is the time for Chinese anthropologists to realize ‘real
Chinese anthropology.’
Though a number of academic papers have been written and introduced
in European countries about Chinese anthropological works, some of them,
unfortunately, lack an impartial outlook. I would like to look back at the outlook
of those Chinese scholars in the past, and to review the problems of
anthropology in China.},
 pages = {117--153},
 title = {中国人類学の独自性と可能性},
 volume = {31},
 year = {2007}
}