WEKO3
-
RootNode
アイテム
首長制とキリスト教 : ミクロネシア，ポーンペイ島とコシャエ島の事例
https://doi.org/10.15021/00004262
https://doi.org/10.15021/000042623ae7953b-af88-432f-801e-e95d4341c434
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KH_016_3_003.pdf (3.0 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2010-02-16 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | 首長制とキリスト教 : ミクロネシア，ポーンペイ島とコシャエ島の事例 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | Chieftainship and Christianity on Pohnpei and Kosrae, in Micronesia | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | ポーンペイ(ポナペ)｜コシャエ｜首長制｜キリスト教｜社会・文化変化 | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | Pohnpei (Ponape)｜Kosrae｜chieftainship｜Christianity｜socio-cultural change | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15021/00004262 | |||||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
中山, 和芳
× 中山, 和芳
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | In the early 19th-century Pohnpeian and Kosraean societies, there were many areas of similarities in social and cultural practices. Each had chiefdom structures denoted by a system of titles. All land was owned by the paramount chiefs (Nahnmwarki on Pohnpei and Tokosra on Kosrae). Thier subjects were allowed to use the land, paid tribute in return, and used respectful language to them. The Pohnpeian and Kosraean experiences of Western contact in the 19th century were also basically similar. From the 1830s increasing numbers of whaleships visited the two islands. Pohnpei and Kosrae experienced a depopulation caused by diseases which foreign ships brought. In 1852 American Congregational missionaries came to the two islands to propagate their religion. Later both islands accepted Christianity. On Pohnpei Christianity was accommodated into the existing social and political framework, and Pohnpeians retain their traditional chieftainship even today. But on Kosrae the acceptance of Christianity caused the abandonment of the chieftainship. In spite of the seemingly similar situations in the two islands, the outcome in each case was markedly different. The purpose of this paper is to examine why there was such a great difference between Pohnpei and Kosrae. There are several factors which influenced processes of change and continuity. First, although the two societies suffered a decline in population, Kosrae, because of the smaller size of its population, was more vulnerable to changes than was Pohnpei. On Kosrae it became difficult to find an eligible candidate to the paramount chief title. Second, there were five autonomous chiefdoms on Pohnpei while Kosrae had a unified polity. On Pohnpei a strong rivalry existed among the five chiefdoms and each of them often pursued different policies from the others. Therefore unified action was hard to attain. Third, Pohnpei was subjected to a far wider range of foreign influences than Kosrae. On Pohnpei many beachcombers settled. On Kosrae they were discouraged from remaining on shore after their conflicts with the Kosraeans. The expulsion of the beachcombers from the island was possible because of the political centralization of Kosraean society. Spanish government officials and soldiers, Catholic priests and German government officials and soldiers came to Pohnpei, but none of them settled on Kosrae. Therefore, when they stood at the crisis caused by depopulation and were looking for a new model for their society, there were many examples on Pohnpei, while the Protestant teachings were the only one for the Kosraeans. Fourth, Spanish and German government officials appointed the Pohnpeian chiefs to the post of native headman to maintain order on the island. The foreign governments helped Pohnpeian chiefs to maintain their positions. The Spanish officials were indifferent to Kosrae. Although the Germans appointed the Kosraen paramount chief to the post of native headman, it was too late to retain the chieftainship. The difference in those factors mentioned above caused the Kosraeans to abandon the chieftainship system and the Pohnpeians to manage to maintain it. On Kosrae, conversion to Christianity is regarded as discontinuous change, while on Pohnpei the process of change since Isokelekel, the first Nahnmwarki, is perceived in terms of cultural continuity. |
|||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
国立民族学博物館研究報告 en : Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology 巻 16, 号 3, p. 633-680, 発行日 1992-03-11 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 国立民族学博物館 | |||||||||||
| 出版者（英） | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | National Museum of Ethnology | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0385-180X | |||||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00091943 | |||||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||||
Share
Cite as
Nakayama, Kazuyoshi, 1992, Chieftainship and Christianity on Pohnpei and Kosrae, in Micronesia: 国立民族学博物館, 633–680 p.
Loading...
