{"created":"2023-06-20T15:59:20.319803+00:00","id":4516,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"f8c04c2c-52a2-4bc7-a670-08eed9e4d261"},"_deposit":{"created_by":17,"id":"4516","owners":[17],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"4516"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:minpaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004516","sets":["345:483"]},"author_link":["7361"],"item_9_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"1981-03-20","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"4","bibliographicPageEnd":"950","bibliographicPageStart":"833","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"5","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"国立民族学博物館研究報告"},{"bibliographic_title":"Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_9_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"This paper attempts to show the universality and relativity\nof the unconscious cognition of space division among humans.\nSince the cognition of direction, i.e., folk orientation, has been\ndiscussed elsewhere [YOSHIDA 1977, 1980a], the cognition of\ndistance, the other fundamental factor in space cognition, is the\nfocus of this paper.\nDemonstratives were selected for analysis because their essential\ncomponent is spatial and also unconscious, and they occur\nworldwide. Although the spatial component of demonstratives\nis stressed here, demonstratives have many other components.\nThe spatial components of demonstratives of 479 languages and/or\ndialects are examined. The lexeme is treated as a unit of demonstratives\nin principle, but the independent form of-demonstratives\nis used as a unit in the case of polysyntetic languages.\nThrough the analysis of the spatial components of demonstratives,\n.47 types of cognition of space division are formulated.\nThese types are assigned to seven super-types; two divisional type\n(2-type; consisting of \"near\" and \"far\"), speaker-centric type (Stype),\nspeaker-hearer type (H-type), vertical up/down type (Vtype),\nfour directional type (D-type), aside-type (As-type), and\nback space type (B-type). Among them, the H-type is closely\nrelated with the personal pronoun system and is complex in terms\nof a definite space division.\nThere are four common types: 1) 2-type (217 out of 479 languages\nand/or dialects, 45.3%), 2) 3F-type (consisting of \"near\",\n\"far\" and \"further\"\n, 83 languages, 17.3%), 3) 3H-type (consisting\nof speaker's space, hearer's space and the other space without both\nspaces, 50 languages, 10.4%), and 4) 3M-type (consisting of \"near\",\n\"middle\" and \"far\"\n, 29 languages, 6.4%). Twenty-nine types\nare specific, and are found in only one language. Though many\nlanguages are assigned to few common types, such as 2-type, 3Ftype,\n3H-type and 3M-type, the diversification of the types of\ncognition of space division is rather large, being found especially\nin New Guinea, Oceania, and America.\nThe etic unit of distance cognition is hypothesized in this paper\nto clarify the general features of distance cognition among humans.\nThere are three levels of distance cognition; biological, physiological,\nand cultural. In the biological level, space is divided into\nthree; individual, social and outer social spaces. Individual space\nis purely egocentric and differs from Hall's personal distance which\nis the distance between two individuals or among more than two\nindividuals [HALL 1966]. On the physiological level, space is\ndivided into four; kinesthetic, aural, visual, and outer visual space\nis added. The critical lines of each space are a) touching limit\nline, b) hailing limit line, and c) visible limit line, respectively.\nAt the cultural level, space has seven divisions : kinesthetic, aural\nand visual spaces are sub-divided into two, respectively, and outer\nvisual space is added to them.\nIt can be argued that individual space coincides with kinesthetic\nspace in humans. That the use of the touching limit line is\nalmost universal (98.1%) is explicable by this hypothesis. In\nother words, the touching limit line is universally recognized, since\nit has a fundamental, biological basis. Although this limit is\nextended psychologically, such aspects are not considered here.\nThough the line is defined as the \"touching limit line\" through\nworldwide, the actual limit varies to some extent among cultures.\nThis is interesting in terms of proxemics.\nSpace division at the physiological level is potentially universal,\naccording to the result of the analysis of spatial component of\ndemonstratives. Space division at the cultural level is specific\namong the cultures, and the seven divisions are enough for discussing\nthe spatial component of demonstratives of the world's languages.\n","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_9_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.15021/00004508","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_9_publisher_33":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"国立民族学博物館"}]},"item_9_publisher_34":{"attribute_name":"出版者（英）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"National Museum of Ethnology"}]},"item_9_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00091943","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_9_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0385-180X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_9_version_type_16":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"吉田, 集而"},{"creatorName":"ヨシダ, シュウジ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"},{"creatorName":"Yoshida, Shuji","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2015-11-19"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KH_005_4_001.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"6.4 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"KH_005_4_001.pdf","url":"https://minpaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4516/files/KH_005_4_001.pdf"},"version_id":"fbaeb04d-e7d3-4554-9d3d-df35718590dc"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"指示詞にみられる空間分割の類型とその普遍性","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"指示詞にみられる空間分割の類型とその普遍性"},{"subitem_title":"Typology and Universality of the Cognition of Space Division through the Analysis of Demonstratives","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"9","owner":"17","path":["483"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2010-02-16"},"publish_date":"2010-02-16","publish_status":"0","recid":"4516","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["指示詞にみられる空間分割の類型とその普遍性"],"weko_creator_id":"17","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-06-20T19:25:17.999315+00:00"}