@article{oai:minpaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004481,
 author = {吉田, 集而 and Yoshida, Shuji},
 issue = {3},
 journal = {国立民族学博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology},
 month = {Jan},
 note = {Person cognition in deixis is the main topic of a series of three
papers : (1) the etic semantic components of person deictics; (2) the
typology of person cognition in deixis and correlation among language
groups and the types; and (3) evolution of the types.
This paper establishes the universal semantic components of
personal deictics, the conceptual basis for the following two papers in
the series. Seven emic studies (Austerlitz 1959; Berlin 1963;
Brichoux 1977; Conklin 1962; Krup & Altmann 1961 and
McKaughan 1959) and three etic studies (Buehler & Freeze 1966;
Forchheimer 1951 and Ingram 1978) on personal deictics are evaluated
here. But it is apparent that componential analysis of personal
deictics is rather arbitrary or intuitive in the emic studies. However,
a combination of emic and etic studies is more powerful than either
types of study individually.
Through discussion of those studies, I formulate a new universally
applicable person deictic system. This system consists of four person
categories, "Dialoquent person (D-person)", "Loquent person (Lperson)",
"Audient person (Au-person") and "Absent person (Abperson)"
to replace the usual Western system such as 1st person
inclusive, 1st person exclusive, 2nd person and 3rd person, respectively.
The most important difference between the new and old systems is
that 1st person inclusive is treated as an independent person category.
In addition, the logical basis for the system is exemplified for D-person
as an independent person. For enumeration, singularity, duality,
"triality" and plurality are adopted instead of other number systems,
because others are unable to deal with the single form of D-person,
such as Maranao, HanunOo and Lakota, for example.
Lastly, Ab-person is unsuitable as a universal person category;
Ab-person is an essential person category in deixis, because it is quite
different from the other categories, and demonstratives are actually
used instead of Ab-person in many instances. Therefore, Ab-person
is omitted from the following discussion.},
 pages = {550--584},
 title = {会話場面における人の概念の類型論（I) : 人称代名詞の etic な成分の再考},
 volume = {7},
 year = {1983},
 yomi = {ヨシダ, シュウジ}
}