{"created":"2023-06-20T15:59:18.447627+00:00","id":4463,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"3972913a-4bd6-4c32-bf5b-f3adf5f43b95"},"_deposit":{"created_by":17,"id":"4463","owners":[17],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"4463"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:minpaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004463","sets":["345:473"]},"author_link":["46"],"item_9_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"1983-08-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"2","bibliographicPageEnd":"488","bibliographicPageStart":"424","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"8","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"国立民族学博物館研究報告"},{"bibliographic_title":"Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_9_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"It is widely known that coordinate conjunctions in the Uralic\nlanguages are of comparatively late origin. But it should not be\nassumed that there was no device to express coordinative relationships\nbetween nouns, other than straightforward juxtaposition.\nOn the contrary, there existed various ways to compensate\nfor the lack of coordinate conjunctions. And many scholars have\nhitherto turned their attention to the phenomena of the Uralic\ncoordination, which might have appeared curious compared\nwith those of modern Indo-European languages.\nIt was not until Ravila's work (1941) that an attempt was\nmade to examine Uralic coordination on a broad scale. Ravila\nexplained the coordination of nouns, in which each juxtaposed\nnoun contains an identical element(s), in connection with the\nbasic principle of the Uralic word order, i.e., the modifier always\nprecedes the modified. According to Ravila, identical elements,\nsuch as dual and plural indicators, or case and possessive suffixes,\nmay function only to signal that the nouns containing them belong\nto the same grammatical category. But he gave no\nsatisfactory answer to the question of why the very curious dual\nand plural suffixes may be attached, even when each noun\nindicates a singular object. Ravila explains that the numerus\nsuffixes of nouns have developed in concordance with the numerus\nconjugations of verbs, and that these suffixes later began to signal\ncoordination when repeated in each noun. However, this\nhypothesis offers a somewhat conceptual impression without\nsupporting evidence. Moreover, the earlier studies of Uralic\ncoordination, including that of Ravila, could not deal with coordination\nin general but could only pose arbitrary examples,\nbecause their notion of coordination was apparently too abstract.\nIn this paper, I adopt the generally accepted theory of transformational\ngrammar for the definition of coordination: i.e.,\nthere are two types of coordination in the deep structure of a\nsentence, namely, sentence conjunction and phrasal conjunction,\neach having different characteristics, although they might optionally\ntake the same surface form. Using this framework, I\nattempt to account for the pecuarlities of all possible coordination\ntypes in the Uralic languages. I have classified Uralic coordination\ninto the following 8 types:—\nI. Juxtaposition of nouns, each having an identical element(s) ;\n2. Juxtaposition of nouns without any identical elements;\n3. Coordination based on a numerus indicator;\n4. Coordination based on a comitative (instrumental) indicator;\n5. Coordination based on a nomenp ossessorisd erivational suffix;\n6. Coordination based on an enclitic particle of emphathy or\naugmentation;\n7. Coordination by an independent coordinate conjunction\nderived from a native morpheme stock; and\n8. Coordination by a coordinate conjunction of foreign origin.\nAfter examining these cases, I reached the following conclusions.\nDevices for phrasal coordination developed earlier\nthan those for sentence coordination, because the latter could\nhave as well been expressed by a simple juxtaposition of sentences.\nType 1 occurs widely among the Uralic languages, when compared\nto Type 2. This may support Ravila's hypothesis that there\nneeded to be some device to indicate nouns belonging to the same\ngrammatical category, when they were juxtaposed. In this\nsense the parallel affixation of identical elements has developed\nas a productive way of coordination. Type 3, 4 and 5 appear to\nhave derived from the peripherical use of their original functions\ndue to the connotation of simultaneousness or accompaniment.\nType 3 was used when things expressed by coordinated nouns\nwere regarded as forming a semantic whole. On the other\nhand Types 6 and 7 have idiosyncracy of sentence coordination.\nI assume that sentence coordination in the deep structure was\nreduced to a simple sentence first by means of an enclitic or\nindependent particle which could function as an adverb of\naugmentation or addition. Present-day Uralic languages seem\nto have a tendency to develop proper coordinate conjunctions,\nwhich can be equally used for both types of coordination, and\nwhich, therefore may correspond to the coordinate conjunctions\nof the well known modern Indo-European languages, from their\nown stock side-by-side with those of foreign origin. It should be\nobserved, however, that they still retain a shade of their original\ncharacteristics in usage and meaning.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_9_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.15021/00004455","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_9_publisher_33":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"国立民族学博物館"}]},"item_9_publisher_34":{"attribute_name":"出版者（英）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"National Museum of Ethnology"}]},"item_9_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00091943","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_9_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0385-180X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_9_version_type_16":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"庄司, 博史"},{"creatorName":"ショウジ, ヒロシ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"},{"creatorName":"Shoji , Hiroshi","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{},{},{},{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2015-11-19"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KH_008_2_004.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"3.6 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"KH_008_2_004.pdf","url":"https://minpaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4463/files/KH_008_2_004.pdf"},"version_id":"670c948a-518d-4004-873a-667d6a4a496a"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"ウラル語族における等位表現の類型","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"ウラル語族における等位表現の類型"},{"subitem_title":"Typology of Coordination in the Uralic Languages","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"9","owner":"17","path":["473"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2010-02-16"},"publish_date":"2010-02-16","publish_status":"0","recid":"4463","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["ウラル語族における等位表現の類型"],"weko_creator_id":"17","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-06-20T19:26:10.921472+00:00"}