{"created":"2023-06-20T15:59:18.404043+00:00","id":4462,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"21bfde33-b09e-4f02-bdaf-509ee47a23f1"},"_deposit":{"created_by":17,"id":"4462","owners":[17],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"4462"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:minpaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004462","sets":["345:473"]},"author_link":["7361"],"item_9_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"1983-08-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"2","bibliographicPageEnd":"423","bibliographicPageStart":"307","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"8","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"国立民族学博物館研究報告"},{"bibliographic_title":"Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_9_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"This paper describes the typology of person deictics, and\nexemplifies the new universal person deictic system discussed\npreviously [YOSHIDA 1982]. It also examines the co-relationship\nbetween typology and language groups.\nUsing 1129 languages (and/or dialects), 9 Basic Types, 23\nDerivative Types and 2 Duality Dominant Types are recognized.\nThe Basic Type is not formulated statistically, as was Ingram's\nmethodology (1978), but theoretically. When all possible terms\nwithin a particular person deictic system exist, the type which has\nthe terms is identified as a Basic Type. For example, a system in\nwhich Loquent person and Audient person have both 'singularity'\nand 'plurality' forms, belongs to a Basic Type, but a system in\nwhich Audient person has only one term in spite of Loquent person\nhaving 'singularity' and 'plurality' forms, as in English, is identified\nas a Derivative Type. Basic Types are divided into two;\nDialoquent Person Type (D-Type) and Non-Dialoquent Person\nType (ND-Type). ND-Type lacks a Dialoquent person category\nwhereas D-Type has one. D-Type is subdivided into two;\nSingularity Dialoquent Person Type (Ds-Type) and Non-Singularity\nDialoquent Person Type (Dns-Type). Only infrequently\namong the world's languages does a 'singularity' form of Dialoquent\nperson occur. However, this occurs more often among the\nMinor Languages of the Philippines [REID 1971], as in Hanunoo\n[CONKLIN 1962]. This is the Ds-Type. The other system has a\nDialoquent person and belongs to the Dns-Type.\nThe Derivative Type is that in which one or more terms are\nabsent from the terms of Basic Type or occur in addition to those\nterms. Since these types appear to be genetically derived from\nBasic Types, they are called here Derivative Type. Only 68\nsamples out of 1141 (6.0%) languages treated here are identified\nas Derivative Type, indicating that in them human recognition\nis rational.\nTwo samples do not distinguish between singularity and\nplurality forms despite the clear existence of a duality form.\nThis is the Duality Dominant Type, and it is noteworthy that\nthis type has the Dialoquent person. Although the 'duality'\nform regularly appears following distinction between singularity\nand plurality forms, it shows that the duality form in deictic\nsystem is closely related with the Dialoquent person category, and\nthat the 'duality' form might be independent of other number\nsystems, although not universally so.\nMost language groups exhibit particular characteristics in the\ntypology of person deictic system. For example, the dominant\ntypes of Austronesian are 5Dns (Dns type with 5 terms) and 6Ds\ntypes. Papuan is 5ND type, Australian is 8Dns, Indo-European\nis 4ND, Afro-Asiatic is 4ND, Nilo-Saharan is also 4ND, and so on.\nIt seems that the notion of person deictics is strongly retained from\nthe ancestral language among the most language groups.\nSometimes, sub-groups have different characteristics that set\nthem apart from the groups. For example, Koman is identified\nas 5Dns dominant type although Nilo-Saharan as a group is\nidentified as 4ND dominant type. Hence, sub-group level\nanalysis might reflect more precisely the actual features of the\nsamples. D-Type and ND-Type are adopted for simplification\nand to clarify the basic notion of the deictic person system. A\ndistribution map of the types on the analysed above is provided\nFig. 30. The map suggests three hypothesis regarding the origins\nof the notion of Dialoquent person category. One may be a\nYinmanese (the southwestern part of China) origin, from where\nthe notion of the category diffused westwards (Munda and\nDravidian), southwards (Kam-Tai, Austro-Asiatic without Munda\nand Austronesian) and northeastwards (Altaic and American\nlanguages). The second is that the origin might have been the\nancestral language of Chado-Hamitic. This is the African center\nof the Dialoquent person category, and the notion of the category\nspread from an uncertain geographical locality of the ancestral\nlanguage to Koman, Kordofanian, Eastern Sudanic, Adamawa\nEastern, West Atlantic and Khoisan. The third hypothesis is\nan Australian origin. Although these hypothesis remain speculative,\nthey are valuable for testing the substratum of general\nhuman recognition from the macro-perspective. ［Key word :\nCognitive Anthropology, universality, world's languages, typology,\norigin and deixis]\n(Please observe that the title of the first paper in this series\nshould read \"Typology of Person Category in Deixis (I)\".)","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_9_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.15021/00004454","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_9_publisher_33":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"国立民族学博物館"}]},"item_9_publisher_34":{"attribute_name":"出版者（英）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"National Museum of Ethnology"}]},"item_9_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00091943","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_9_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0385-180X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_9_version_type_16":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"吉田, 集而"},{"creatorName":"ヨシダ, シュウジ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"},{"creatorName":"Yoshida, Shuji","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2015-11-19"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KH_008_2_003.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"5.3 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"KH_008_2_003.pdf","url":"https://minpaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4462/files/KH_008_2_003.pdf"},"version_id":"c8464dd7-2302-4fd3-baed-691a12df4541"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"会話場面における人の概念の類型論（II) : その類型と類型の世界的分布","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"会話場面における人の概念の類型論（II) : その類型と類型の世界的分布"},{"subitem_title":"Typology of Person Category in Deixis (II)  : The Types of Person Category and It's Distribution in the World","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"9","owner":"17","path":["473"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2010-02-16"},"publish_date":"2010-02-16","publish_status":"0","recid":"4462","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["会話場面における人の概念の類型論（II) : その類型と類型の世界的分布"],"weko_creator_id":"17","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-06-20T19:26:11.877979+00:00"}