{"created":"2023-06-20T15:59:11.003172+00:00","id":4258,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"148dd1ee-bda3-40d0-a60e-8b913ebe9319"},"_deposit":{"created_by":17,"id":"4258","owners":[17],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"4258"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:minpaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004258","sets":["345:438"]},"author_link":["5751"],"item_9_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"1992-07-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"1","bibliographicPageEnd":"33","bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"17","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"国立民族学博物館研究報告"},{"bibliographic_title":"Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_9_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"In 1908 the royal family of Klungkung, the oldest and the last\nkingdom of Bali, by then part of Dutch East India, committed the\nto tourism. It aims to make a contribution to the historical anthropology\nof the Island as well as to the anthropology of tourism.\nThe main part of the paper consists of four sections. The first section\ndescribes the birth of Bali as the \"tourist paradise\" in the 1920s to\nthe 1930s. In this setting, the roles played in the old theatre state of Bali,\nsuch as those of sponsors (kings) , director (priests) and actors/audience\n(peasants) had to change drastically. Now the \"theatre\" acted as hosts\nto tourists within the colonial state. The second section pays special attention\nto the role of artists, scholars and anthropologists—Walter\nSpies, a German artist and musician, and Margaret Mead, the American\nanthropologist, among others—who stayed in Bali in the 1930s, and who\nhelped creat the Western perception of Bali as the exotic, oriental \"last\nparadise.\" Related to this, the third section examines the re-creation of\ntraditional Balinese art—dance in particular—under the influence of the\ntourist, a Balinese version of the \"invention of tradition\" to quote Eric\nHobsbawm. The final section analyses the present situation in which the\n\"tourist paradise\" has been transformed further into the \"national park\nof beautiful Indonesia\" as part of Indonesia's nation building process.\nBoth tourism and nationalism necessarily empasise the beauty of the Indonesian\nnation, and particularly that of Bali as its foremost tourist attraction.\nBy examining the Balinese cultural dynamics in relation to tourism,\nI am analysing the Balinese version of what James Clifford has called the\n\"modern art -culture system.\" Following Clifford, I mean by the \"artculture\nsystem\" the way in which the West adopts, transforms and consumes\nnon-Western cultural elements. In the twentieth century, objects\nfrom \"primitive\" societies have been re-evaluated both as \"works of\narts\" by artists (and also, importantly, by tourists) , and as \"scientific\ncultural materials\" by anthropolgists. In this system artists, tourists and\nanthropologists play complementary and in some ways, similar, roles,\neach in establishing the \"authenticity\" of cultures.\nIt is within this modern art-culture system that the Balinese tourism\nis embedded. In other words, as is the case with museums which\nClifford analyses, it is this modern system which the anthropology of\ntourism must really analyse. In this sense the anthropology of tourism\nmust be the anthropology of modernity and/or of post-modernity. The\nBalinese case considered here is just one example which demonstrates\nthis thesis.\npuputan, mass suicide, by marching helplessly and almost in a state of\ntrance against the invading Dutch colonial army. It was literally the\ndeath of negara, the theatre state of nineteenth-century Bali, analysed by\nClifford Geertz. After the old state died out, however, Bali was\ndiscovered by Western pioneer tourists and was reborn again as \"the last\nparadise\" under the Dutch colonial regime.\nBy the 1930s Balinese tourism was well developed, to the extent that\nin 1931 Miguel Covarrubias, a Mexican artist and traveller and the writer\nof the now classic Island of Bali wrote of the Island: \"we were disappointed;\nthe tourist rush was in full swing.\" After a break during the\nWorld War II and following the Indonesian Independence Revolution\nperiod, tourism in Bali reappeared again in the late 1960s as part of the\ndevelopment policy of the government of the independent Republic of Indonesia.\nIt goes without saying that the Island has now gained worldwide\nfame as an international tourist site. The number of tourists in\n1991 is reported as amounting to over 600,000.\nThis paper describes the historical transformation of Bali from the\nnineteenth-century \"theatre state\" to the twentieth-century \"tourist\nparadise,\" and examines the dynamism of Balinese culture with reference","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_9_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.15021/00004250","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_9_publisher_33":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"国立民族学博物館"}]},"item_9_publisher_34":{"attribute_name":"出版者（英）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"National Museum of Ethnology"}]},"item_9_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00091943","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_9_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0385-180X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_9_version_type_16":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"山下, 晋司"},{"creatorName":"ヤマシタ, シンジ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"},{"creatorName":"Yamashita, Shinji","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2015-11-19"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KH_017_1_001.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"3.0 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"KH_017_1_001.pdf","url":"https://minpaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4258/files/KH_017_1_001.pdf"},"version_id":"e18e5c0f-5d84-4a88-8986-6d44fdd0bd54"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"バリ｜観光｜芸能｜ナショナリズム｜歴史","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Bali｜tourism｜art｜nationalism｜history","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"「劇場国家」から「旅行者の楽園」へ : 20世紀バリにおける「芸術 文化システム」としての観光","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"「劇場国家」から「旅行者の楽園」へ : 20世紀バリにおける「芸術 文化システム」としての観光"},{"subitem_title":"From “Theatre State” to “Tourist Paradise” : An Analysis of Tourism as the Art Cultures Systems in Twentieth Century Bali","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"9","owner":"17","path":["438"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2010-02-16"},"publish_date":"2010-02-16","publish_status":"0","recid":"4258","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["「劇場国家」から「旅行者の楽園」へ : 20世紀バリにおける「芸術 文化システム」としての観光"],"weko_creator_id":"17","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-06-20T17:17:14.637094+00:00"}