@article{oai:minpaku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00003866,
 author = {菊澤, 律子 and Kikusawa, Ritsuko},
 issue = {4},
 journal = {国立民族学博物館研究報告, Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {本論では，オーストロネシア語族における適用態動詞の形態および機能，ま
た適用態構文の比較に基づき，この語族にみられる多様な適用態が歴史的にど
のような経緯を経て発達したのか，について議論する。
　まず，オーストロネシア語族の言語に関して，これまで同じ「適用態」とい
う名称で記述されてきた構文が類型論的には異なる性質をもつことを示し，そ
れぞれを，「フィリピン型」，「マレー型」，「オセアニア型」と呼ぶ。次に，オー
ストロネシア祖語の構文を示し，3つの適用態の型が共通する祖構文からそれ
ぞれどのように発達したのかについて議論する。とくに，これまでに再建され
た多数の他動詞語尾のうち，*-a「一般他動詞語尾」および*-i「場所を表わす他
動詞語尾」の意味および機能と，形態統語論的比較分析の結果を組み合わせる
とうまく説明ができるとし，その結果，フィリピン型の言語は他動詞の型の数
を増やす方向に変化したこと，マレー型の言語では動詞の体系そのものが変化
し，新たなパラダイムが発達したこと，オセアニア型の言語では，祖語におけ
る拡張自動詞文と他動詞文の区別が失われたと考えられることを示す。なお，
これらの3つの変化は，それぞれの言語グループで独自に発達したものであり，
同じ方向に向かう単一の変化の異なる段階を示すものではない。
　本論は，適用態構文に関する特徴の一部のみを扱ったものであるが，今後こ
こで示された構文の変化を軸とすることで，異なる型の適用態における機能や
意味の変化，また，同じ形態素が関わる使役構文の発達との関係等，関連する
さまざまな議論をすすめることができると考える。, In this paper1), based on a comparison of the forms and functions of
applicative verbs in Austronesian languages and of the clause structures in
which such verbs appear, I will discuss the mechanisms by which the reconstructed
proto-system developed into the diverse systems currently found in
the language family today.
I will first show that what have been described as applicative verbs for
Austronesian languages typologically belong to three different types, which
will be referred to in this paper as “Philippine-type,” “Malay-type,” and
“Oceanic-type.” Second, I will propose a reconstructed system for Proto-
Austronesian, and demonstrate how the three different types of applicative
constructions developed from it. I will argue that a system with two transitive
constructions, general transitive (marked with *-a) and locational transitive
(marked with *-i), are clearly reconstructible for Proto-Austronesian.
From this system, Formosan and Philippine languages developed their systems
by increasing the number of types of transitive clause, while some languages
in Indonesia developed their systems by extending, and subsequently
re-organizing their inherited verb paradigm. It appears that Oceanic languages
developed from a system in which the earlier derivational distinction
between extended-intransitive and transitive verbs was lost. The changes
described for the three types of languages discussed in this paper must have
taken place independently from one another, and the changes suggested for
Malay-type languages appears to reflect relatively recent innovations.
The proposed scenario ultimately provides explanations for many phe-
nomena related to applicative verbs in Austronesian languages, such as the
functional and semantic differences among the different types of applicative
sentences.},
 pages = {413--455},
 title = {On The Development of Applicative Constructions in Austronesian Languages},
 volume = {36},
 year = {2012},
 yomi = {キクサワ, リツコ}
}